tewLabs' challenge: to capture the informal, collaborative process; to extract Intellectual-Capital (I.C.) Data Sets from document work products; to identify the thought stream of the contributor; to reconfigure thought streams and Knowledge Units to the user's point-of-view; to create knowledge as a dynamic commodity with usefulness in more than one way; to provide intuitive options for users to create relevance that the back-end architect cannot imagine; to create synergistic exchange; to model honest, creative dissonance; to create compromise with multiple perspectives; to gist thought.
What We can do for Your Company Now:tewLabs' Knowledge ManagementOverview of the Technology
Objectives
Sample Statement of Work
(U.S. Patent No. 5,721,938)
Text search in its current stage of development, operates from the Latin paradigm of single words having single meanings. For English with multiple meanings of words, the current engines produce a frustratingly high return of searched words but not the relevant meaning that the user seeks. Moving past the word-centric paradigm, tewLabs uses fixed-word order to gist for thought-centric language strings adding to and deepening, not eliminating, existing data storage mechanisms and engines.
The gisting process allows the user to organize data into chunks of thought while simultaneously determining both "what is a thought" and where in the thought a word occurs. The substantive relevance of "where," i.e., the placement, greatly affects meaning which, however, only the user can determine.
For example, "Russia invaded Hungary" has different import from "Hungary invaded Russia." The human being, the user, decides or "gists" the meaning. In other words, the key question is "relevant to what?" Tapping into the relational data base of English, the user becomes the architect of thought, girding data sets into new or newly related information strings. The user creates the appropriate relevance tailored to a vertical market (or lay reader) beyond assigned word attributes, canned phrases or pre-determined weighted criteria.
The engine offers the user options, beyond his or her own immediate or preferred perspective, to think about and decide what affect a word, a context pattern, or an information string creates, based upon where it is placed in the thought stream.
Currently in the field, broad categories exist for vertical markets wherein potential combinations of thought have prescribed limits which cannot anticipate every possible use. Despite the benefit of specificity for a vertical market, this delimited approach has created inadvertent problems in the Knowledge-Management area. tewLabs' engine proposes the mechanism to anticipate unlimited choices of combined meanings for the user to choose. To do so, tewLabs' engine provides 1) back-end triggers and algorithms for word order, and 2) front-end intuitive data sorting within the architecture of the binary structure of thought. In other words, tewLabs' engine has identified the architectural elements common to thought while assigning the architectural combinations for meanings, prompted by dialogue triggers and binary placements, to the user.
tewLabs' engine offers an economy for streamlining the collaborative flow of informal Knowledge Management by object-sorting linguistic context strings. It further enhances how the data base deals with categorizing words with a further level of syntactic analysis. The user can limit the retrieval of a given word's meaning, not just literal return of the word. Further, the user can also govern the flow and substantive meaning of words in their context.
As a Fifth Generation Language, tewLabs' engine provides both high-level natural-language sorting as well as perspective options to the user with low-level machine language efficiency, portability, and legacy-system bridging. With efficient routing to relevant language strings in data-base text repositories, tewLabs proposes capturing the Intellectual Capital warehoused as tagged data or indexed categories. Thereby the harnessed power of warehoused data can transmute ephemeral and currently illusive processes into commodities. The informal collaborative process captured becomes Intellectual Capital. The captured Intellectual Capital becomes a pathway for future decisions with reusable Intellectual Capital Data Strings.
Intellectual Capital Data Sets (I.C. Data Sets)
Knowledge Units
Actualizing the Informal Collaborative Process
Using Warehouse Data and Customer Service Business Applications
Phase I: Problem Assessment
Identify thought patterns for a given Work Group
Match the ThoughtPrint® inventories to work-product writing: identify common Intellectual-Capital Data Sets
Map assessed ThoughtPrints® with thought patterns in the work products for the organization
Identify strategies to reduce communications barriers on-line and organizationally
Capture Intellectual-Capital strengths within any grouped division of the company
Coordinate identified strengths and needed strategies
Phase II: Solutions
Assess Sample documents from a data base to illustrate I.C. Data Sets
Compare assessment to topical indexing and word tagging repositories
Bridge legacy systems and integrate ThoughtPrinter® as a knowledge management tool
Find what context pattern contains most heavily weighted word tagging and indexing retrieval
Phase III
Extracting Intellectual Capital
Model prototype for feedback
Compare query sets to results gathered from Phases I and II
Identify added value for indexing data in context patterns
Add dialogue triggers and intuitive context relationships to query sets
Phase IV
Bridging Legacy Systems
Test Prototype
Capture the informal, collaborative evolution from idea to design
Phase V
Implementation and Portability
Identify contingencies, "what-ifs," next steps
Measure accumulated change
Horizontal "Heart" View
Seminars |
Software | Academia |
Free Text | Voice Activation
NLP | Machine Translation |
Return Home